thetrading.tools
ValuationUpdated monthly · data through September 2026

Is the Stock Market Overvalued? Nine Valuation Measures Since 1881

US stocks are very expensive by historical standards. The valuation score is 97 out of 100, with all 9 measures in the top tenth of their own history. That has been informative about the next decade’s returns and has given little guidance about the next decline.

Valuation score2026-09
97/100
Very expensive: score 90+

The average of 9 percentiles, each ranking one measure against its own history; not a measure of how far stocks are overvalued or of the odds of a decline. Record: 97.4 in August 2026.

Ranked against earlier history
96
Measures in their top tenth
9 of 9
Real return a year, 10 yrs after score 90+
0.5%

Historical median across overlapping monthly starts, after inflation and including dividends; 3 completed independent decades.

Today's reading

As of September 2026, the score of 9 valuation measures stands at 97.3 out of 100, just below its record of 97.4 in August 2026, and Tobin's Q, price to sales and market cap to GDP are at a record. Ranked against earlier history, it reads 96. Since 1901, months scoring 90+ on that version were followed by a median real return of 0.5% a year over the next decade across overlapping monthly starts, against 6.6% for all months; the 3 completed independent decades returned 1.4%, 6.5% and 6.2% a year.

Sources, methodology & freshnessShiller S&P data (1881+), Kenneth French CRSP book-to-market portfolios (1926+), Federal Reserve Z.1 and BEA via FRED (1945+) · Monthly; quarterly and annual inputs carried until their next releaseData as of 2026-09-01 · Open ↓
Source
Shiller S&P data (1881+), Kenneth French CRSP book-to-market portfolios (1926+), Federal Reserve Z.1 and BEA via FRED (1945+)
Methodology
Nine measures, each ranked against its own history; score = average percentile; ranked against the whole record and against earlier history
Updates
Monthly; quarterly and annual inputs carried until their next releaseLast: 2026-09-01
Maintained & reviewed by Yuriy Matso — methodology shown on the page.
01

Nine measures in one score since 1881

The solid line ranks each measure against its whole record. The dashed line ranks it only against earlier history. They differ for older peaks because several measures have drifted upward for decades: ranked against today, 1929 scores 76; ranked against its own past, it scores 99. Hover for both scores and how many measures each one averages.

0255075901001900192019401960198020002020S&P 500 (log)7,63119291962200020269795.6
Score, whole recordRanked against earlier history
Monthly, January 1881 to September 2026. Average percentile of the measures available each month: four before 1926, five until 1945 and nine since late 1947. The earlier-history line starts in March 1901, once twenty years of data exist, and averages fewer measures in its early decades. Shaded: scores of 90 and above.

“Earlier history” uses historical release-lag assumptions and today's revised data, including Shiller's earnings and dividends interpolated from quarterly figures; it does not reconstruct what investors could actually see at the time.

02

The same four measures throughout

Some of the movement above comes from adding measures over time. This version uses only the four that exist since 1881, the CAPE, trailing P/E, dividend yield and distance above trend, so its composition never changes. It reads 96 today, against a record of 99 in July 1999.

02550759010019001920194019601980200020201929196220009693.0
Four measures, whole recordRanked against earlier history
Monthly, January 1881 to September 2026. Average percentile of the Shiller CAPE, trailing P/E, dividend yield and the distance above the long-term trend.
03

The nine measures today

Each measure's latest reading and its rank against its own record, where 100 is the most expensive. Quarterly and annual measures publish with a lag, so their dates differ. Several share a numerator, the market's price or value, so nine agreeing measures corroborate one another without being nine independent pieces of evidence.

40.6× · Sep 2026 · since 1881
99
rank
25.2× · Jun 2026 · since 1881
92
rank
Dividend yield
1.10% · Jun 2026 · since 1881
100
rank
Price to book
4.85 · Dec 2025 · since 1926
99
rank
Tobin’s Q
2.12 · Q2 2026 · since 1945
100
rank
Price to sales
4.93 · Q2 2026 · since 1947
100
rank
288% · Q2 2026 · since 1947
100
rank
21.8× · Q2 2026 · since 1947
94
rank
+56% · Sep 2026 · since 1881
93
rank

Dividend yield ranks in reverse: a lower yield means a higher valuation. Trailing P/E peaked in 2009 because earnings collapsed while prices fell less, the measure's known weakness in recessions. Price to book is a proxy built from Ken French's CRSP book-to-market portfolios; price to sales divides nonfinancial corporate equity by gross value added.

04

What real returns followed each score?

Real returns here are after inflation and include dividends. Months are grouped by the score ranked against earlier history. The medians use every monthly start, which overlap heavily; the completed independent decades, ten-year windows that do not overlap, show how few separate outcomes stand behind each figure. Scores of 90 and above covered 14% of months.

Very expensive (score 90+), today
+0.5% a year over the next 10 yrs
Completed decades: +1.4% (1928), +6.5% (1959) and +6.2% (1996)
Next 3 yrs +4.0% a year · next year +7.1%
Expensive (score 75–90)
+5.6% a year over the next 10 yrs
Completed decades: +5.2% (1901), +0.4% (1928), +2.1% (1939), +9.0% (1955), −1.0% (1966), +10.8% (1987), +0.8% (2002) and +9.5% (2013)
Next 3 yrs +7.7% a year · next year +7.4%
Middle of the range (score 25–75)
+9.2% a year over the next 10 yrs
Completed decades: +5.1% (1901), −4.6% (1911), +11.7% (1921), +5.1% (1931), +10.2% (1943), +12.5% (1953), −1.1% (1970), +10.3% (1983), +8.4% (1994) and +5.8% (2006)
Next 3 yrs +8.6% a year · next year +9.6%
Cheap (score below 25)
+9.2% a year over the next 10 yrs
Completed decades: +5.4% (1903), +0.5% (1913), +11.6% (1923), +5.1% (1938), +17.9% (1949), +5.2% (1974) and +10.7% (1984)
Next 3 yrs +8.1% a year · next year +10.5%
All months: +6.6% a year over 10 yrs · +8.8% next year

The completed decades after scores of 90 and above began in 1928 (+1.4% a year), 1959 (+6.5% a year) and 1996 (+6.2% a year); the one from 2018 has not finished. The overlapping-month median of +0.5% sits below all of them: most of its starting months fall in the long expensive stretches of the 1960s and the late 1990s, and the later months of each stretch, nearer the 1968 and 2000 peaks, did worse than the first month, where each completed decade starts. Neither figure is a forecast. The median next-year return after scores of 90 and above, +7.1%, was close to the +8.8% for all months.

S&P 500 real total return from Shiller's price, dividends and CPI. Download everything: valuation_composite.json.

How Stock Market Valuation Works

  1. 1
    Collect nine valuation measures
    Three come from Robert Shiller’s monthly S&P data since 1881 (the CAPE, price to trailing earnings and price to dividends). Price to book comes from Ken French’s CRSP book-to-market portfolios since 1926. Tobin’s Q, price to sales, market cap to GDP and market cap to profits come from the Federal Reserve and BEA since the late 1940s. The ninth is how far the real S&P 500 total return sits above its long-run trend line.
  2. 2
    Rank each against its own history
    Each measure becomes a percentile: the share of its own readings below the one being ranked. That puts a P/E and a ratio to GDP on one scale, from 0 for the cheapest reading on record to 100 for the most expensive.
  3. 3
    Average the percentiles
    The valuation score is the average of the measures available each month. It is not a percentile itself and does not measure how far stocks are overvalued. Before 1926 only the three Shiller measures and the trend exist, so early scores rest on fewer inputs; the page shows how many are in the average and adds a version built from the same four measures throughout.
  4. 4
    Rank against earlier history
    A percentile against the whole record ranks 1929 against data from 2026. The page also ranks each measure only against earlier readings, with release lags assumed and at least twenty years of history, and grades what happened next on that version. It uses today’s revised data, so it approximates what investors saw without reconstructing it.

Who Uses Stock Market Valuation

Long-term investors
Valuation has said little about the next year and a great deal about the next decade. The study on the page shows the real returns that followed each level, with the number of independent decades behind each figure.
Allocators
No single ratio settles the question, because each has its own distortions: earnings collapse in recessions, dividends shrank as buybacks grew. When nine measures with different flaws agree, the reading is harder to dismiss.
Writers and researchers
The composite puts 1929, the 1960s, 2000 and today on one scale, and every input is downloadable.

Pro Tips

01
Read both lines
Several measures have drifted upward for decades as payouts fell and companies grew relative to the economy, so the full-record ranking marks older peaks lower. The earlier-history line ranks each era against its own past and is the one the forward study uses.
02
It is not a timing signal
The market has stayed in the top tenth of this composite for years at a time. Its record speaks to the following decade’s returns; it has never dated the next drawdown.
03
Watch the count
A reading built from three measures in 1929 and nine today are not equally informed. The page shows how many measures are in the average at every date.

Common Issues & Solutions

Why does trailing P/E look expensive in 2009?▾
Earnings collapsed faster than prices in the financial crisis, so price divided by trailing earnings hit a record while stocks were cheap on every other measure. That is a known weakness of the trailing P/E, and averaging it with eight other measures is what keeps it from steering the composite.
Where are forward P/E and EV/EBITDA?▾
Both need analyst forecasts or company-level enterprise values, which no free source publishes over a long history. The page uses measures with public records going back decades, and states what it leaves out.
How are price to book and price to sales measured?▾
Price to book is total market value over total book equity across Ken French’s CRSP book-to-market deciles, annual from 1926. Price to sales is the market value of nonfinancial corporations over their gross value added, from the Federal Reserve’s financial accounts and BEA, quarterly from 1947. Both are proxies for the index-level ratios, which have no free long history.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the stock market overvalued?▾
By the nine long-running measures on this page, US stocks are very expensive. As of September 2026 the valuation score is 97 out of 100, with 9 of the 9 measures in the top tenth of their own history. That has said more about the following decade’s returns than about the next year.
What does the valuation score mean?▾
It is the average of nine percentiles, each saying where one measure stands in its own history. A score of 97 does not mean stocks are 97% overvalued or that a decline has a 97% probability. Today’s score is itself higher than 99.8% of past monthly scores.
What returns followed scores like today’s?▾
Ranked against earlier history, months scoring 90+ since 1901 were followed by a median real return, after inflation and including dividends, of 7.1% over the next year and 0.5% a year over the next ten, across overlapping monthly starts. The completed non-overlapping decades in that group returned 1.4% (from 1928), 6.5% (from 1959) and 6.2% (from 1996) a year, so the history is short and uneven.
When was the stock market this expensive before?▾
Ranked against earlier history, the score’s highest readings came in October 1929 (99), January 1962 (98), July 2000 (98) and January 2026 (97). On the same four measures throughout, the 1999 record of 99 remains above today’s 96.
How do you combine different valuation ratios?▾
Each ratio is turned into a percentile of its own history, so a P/E of 25 and a market cap of 288% of GDP become comparable numbers between 0 and 100. The composite is their average.
What is Tobin’s Q?▾
The market value of nonfinancial corporations divided by their net worth at replacement cost, from the Federal Reserve’s financial accounts. A Q above 1 means the market values companies above what it would cost to rebuild their assets.
Where does the data come from?▾
Robert Shiller’s monthly S&P composite data (shillerdata.com), Kenneth French’s CRSP portfolios, the Federal Reserve’s Z.1 financial accounts and BEA national accounts through FRED.

Explore Other Tools

Last updated: 2026-09-01