thetrading.tools

Data Center Demand Proxy

Over the 12 months through July 24, 2026, average electricity demand across PJM and ERCOT was 14.1% above its 2019 baseline. Demand across the rest of the lower-48 grid was 5.6% higher. The proxy's growth gap is therefore 8.6 percentage points in favor of the PJM+ERCOT basket. That is evidence of where broad load growth is concentrated—not evidence that data centers alone caused it.

PJM + ERCOT index
114.1
2019 = 100
Rest-of-grid index
105.6
2019 = 100
Growth gap
+8.6 pp
basket minus rest
Basket 12-month avg
154.3 GW
+3.3% vs prior 12 months

What this proxy does—and does not—measure

EIA does not publish a daily meter for data centers. This index tests a narrower, falsifiable proposition: whether total demand in two broad systems central to the data-center buildout story is growing faster than demand elsewhere. It cannot tell us how many megawatts data centers use, separate AI facilities from other data centers, or assign the gap to any one cause.

Demand growth: PJM + ERCOT vs the rest

Each line is a trailing-365-day average indexed to its own 2019 calendar-year mean. That makes the comparison about growth rates, not the basket's absolute size.

Jul 31, 2021Jul 24, 2026
98.8106.5114.120222023202420252026114.1105.6
PJM + ERCOTRest of lower 48
Trailing-365-day average electricity demand, indexed so each group's 2019 calendar-year average = 100, June 30, 2016 – July 24, 2026. Source: EIA-930 adjusted demand.

The growth gap

Positive means the PJM+ERCOT basket has grown more since 2019; negative means the rest of the grid has. The latest reading is +8.6 percentage points.

Jul 31, 2021Jul 24, 2026
0 pp4.3 pp8.6 pp202220232024202520268.6 pp
PJM+ERCOT demand index minus the rest-of-grid demand index. This relative-growth spread is the proxy's headline reading.

Inside the basket

System12-month avgSince 2019Vs prior 12 months
PJM / Mid-Atlantic (MIDA)97.7 GW+6.9%+3.1%
ERCOT / Texas (TEX)56.6 GW+29.3%+3.7%

Why traders and investors watch this

Utilities, independent power producers and grid-equipment makers have re-rated on expected data-center load — expectations that are physically checkable. The demand has to show up in PJM and ERCOT, and this gap is the daily scoreboard for whether it is. Because a data center announced today draws power years from now, the proxy deliberately lags the news flow: it confirms or refutes stories the stocks priced instantly, which is exactly what makes it useful. The falsification test is explicit — if the corridors stop outgrowing the rest of the grid for several quarters while announced capacity supposedly energizes, the thesis's physical foundation is weakening before it reaches earnings. Read it next to the valuation side of the same trade on the Bubble Tracker.

How this is computed—and what can move it

We sum EIA-930 adjusted hourly demand for the Mid-Atlantic region (PJM) and Texas (ERCOT), reduce complete days to an average, and compare their trailing-365-day mean with the equivalent mean for the other 11 lower-48 EIA regions. Both sides are normalized to 100 using their own 2019 calendar-year average. Days missing any one region's 24 hourly values are dropped rather than estimated; a window is published only when at least 350 complete days are present.

The long window suppresses most seasonal noise but is not a weather adjustment. Population growth, electrification, industrial activity, efficiency, rooftop solar, unusual weather, reporting changes and data centers can all move regional demand. PJM is especially broad: EIA-930 does not expose the Dominion zone separately in this dataset. Recent values also remain subject to EIA's roughly 30-day revision window.

Sources, methodology & freshnessLast updated 2026-07-24 · Open ↓
Source
EIA-930 adjusted hourly demand for all 13 lower-48 regions (public domain)
Methodology
PJM + ERCOT trailing-365-day average vs the other 11 regions; each indexed to its own 2019 average
Updates
Daily—latest complete EIA-930 day; recent observations remain provisionalLast: 2026-07-24
Maintained & reviewed by Yuriy Matso — methodology shown on the page.

thetrading.tools PRO

Talk to this data with your AI

PRO is an MCP server that plugs Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI agent straight into everything on this site — the live market scores, ~90 economic indicators with full histories, and every signal study. Ask a market question; your AI answers from our data, dated and sourced.

Get PRO — $39/mo

Cancel anytime

How Data Center Demand Proxy Works

  1. 1
    Two baskets, one gap
    The basket is PJM (Mid-Atlantic — home of Data Center Alley) plus ERCOT (Texas); the control is every other lower-48 EIA region. Each basket's trailing-365-day average demand is indexed to its own 2019 calendar-year average, and the headline is the growth gap in percentage points.
  2. 2
    Why a proxy and not a meter
    No free source meters data-center load directly — utilities disclose it selectively and inconsistently. Broad regional footprints are reproducible back to 2015 and hard to game; the trade-off is that the basket also contains everything else in those regions (weather, industry, population), which the page states up front.
  3. 3
    Trailing 365 days kills the weather
    A full-year rolling window averages out seasons and heat waves. What is left is structural: if the corridors are persistently outgrowing the rest of the grid, something in them is adding load — and the dominant new load in both since 2022 is data centers.
  4. 4
    The components are shown separately
    PJM and ERCOT are different stories — Virginia's build-out vs Texas's (data centers plus crypto plus industry plus population). The page shows each component's index, YoY and growth since 2019 so the aggregate cannot hide a divergence.

Who Uses Data Center Demand Proxy

AI-Infrastructure Investors
Power names re-rated on the data-center thesis. This gap is the physical series that thesis predicts: corridors persistently outgrowing the control. If the gap converges, the story's foundation is weakening — before it shows in earnings.
Utility Analysts
Load-growth forecasts in PJM and ERCOT drive capex plans, rate cases and capacity prices. A reproducible, daily-updated growth series for exactly those footprints is the sanity check on the official forecasts.
Skeptics of the Narrative
Every boom narrative deserves a falsifiable test. This one is deliberately constructed so it CAN fail — the control basket is the counterfactual, and the page shows both lines instead of only the exciting one.
Grid & Gas Watchers
Structural load growth in specific regions tightens the whole system — more gas power burn, thinner headroom. This series is the slow-moving cause behind readings on the Grid Stress and Gas Storage pages.

Pro Tips

01
The gap is the signal, not the levels
Both baskets grow with the economy. The information is the spread between them — regional growth the control group cannot explain.
02
Check the components for confirmation
The thesis is strongest when PJM and ERCOT lead together. If one corridor stalls while the other runs, the story is more local (one state's interconnection queue, one weather year) than structural.
03
This lags announcements by design
A data center announced today draws power in 2-4 years. The proxy tracks energization, not press releases — expect it to trail the news flow and confirm (or refute) it later. That lag is what makes it useful against stocks that price announcements instantly.
04
Mind the denominator effect
Growth since a 2019 baseline compounds: a corridor a few points ahead every year opens a wide cumulative gap. The YoY figures are the current pace; the index gap is the accumulated story.

Common Issues & Solutions

Is this actually measuring data centers?
No — and the page leads with that. It measures total regional demand growth in the two corridors vs everywhere else. Data centers are the dominant identified driver of the recent divergence, but weather years, industrial projects and population flows are all in the number too.
Why PJM and ERCOT and not Virginia specifically?
EIA-930's regional footprints are the reproducible public unit. Dominion's Virginia zone — the sharpest lens — exists in EIA's subregion files back to 2018 and is the planned upgrade; the broad-corridor version ships first because it is robust back to 2015.
What would falsify the data-center power thesis here?
The growth gap converging toward zero for several quarters while announced capacity supposedly energizes — corridors growing no faster than the control means the physical build-out is not showing up where it must.
Why is the chart monthly if the window is daily?
The trailing-365-day index moves slowly by construction; monthly points render the multi-year story without pretending day-to-day wiggles in a rolling annual average carry information.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much electricity are data centers actually using?
Nobody outside the utilities knows precisely — there is no free metered source. This page tracks the best reproducible public evidence: total demand growth in the two build-out corridors (PJM and ERCOT) vs the rest of the grid, indexed to 2019. The live gap in percentage points is the headline reading.
Is data-center electricity demand really growing faster than the rest of the grid?
The corridors that host the build-out have been persistently outgrowing the other 11 EIA regions on a trailing-12-month basis — the live gap, each basket's growth since 2019, and their YoY rates are on this page and update daily. Whether that continues is exactly what the series exists to track.
Why does this matter for investors?
Utilities, independent power producers and grid-equipment makers have re-rated on expected data-center load. Those expectations are checkable: the demand has to physically appear in PJM and ERCOT. This proxy is the daily scoreboard for whether it is.
What are the limits of this proxy?
It cannot attribute growth to data centers specifically — regional demand includes weather, industry and population. It uses broad EIA regions rather than utility zones, excludes behind-the-meter generation, and its trailing-year window deliberately lags. It is a growth gauge with stated error bars, not a meter.
What would make this series more precise?
EIA's subregion files carry Dominion's Virginia zone — Data Center Alley's actual utility footprint — back to 2018. That upgrade is planned; the current broad-corridor version ships first because it is reproducible back to 2015 and robust to zone redefinitions.

Explore Other Tools

Last updated: 2026-07-24